Response to Reviewers
نویسندگان
چکیده
Kazuhiro Watanabe ([email protected]) Naoyoshi Nagata ([email protected]) Takuro Shimbo ([email protected]) Ryo Nakashima ([email protected]) Etsuko Furuhata ([email protected]) Toshiyuki Sakurai ([email protected]) Naoki Akazawa ([email protected]) Chizu Yokoi ([email protected]) Masao Kobayakawa ([email protected]) Junichi Akiyama ([email protected]) Naomi Uemura ([email protected])
منابع مشابه
Peer Reviewers’ Comments on Research Articles Submitted by Iranian Researchers
The invisible hands of peer reviewers play a determining role in the eventual fate of submissions to international English-medium journals. This study builds on the assumption that non-native researchers and prospective academic authors may find the whole strive for publication, and more specifically, the tough review process, less threatening if they are aware of journal reviewers’ expectation...
متن کاملارزیابی میزان دقت داوران یکی از مجلات علمی پژوهشی فارسی زبان در تشخیص اصلاحات مورد نیاز یک مقاله علمی ارسالی؛ سال 1389
Background and Objectives: Final corrections on a manuscript sent for publication in a scientific journal are suggested by reviewers. So this qualifies the paper with the least errors for publication. The present study aimed to assess the Persian language peer reviewers' comments on a manuscript sent to an Iranian Scientific Journal (journal of Rafsanjan university of medical sciences), 2010....
متن کاملSpecial Appreciations Are Given to Top Five Peer-Reviewers of Journal of Food Quality and Hazards Control in 2018
This article has no abstract. DOI: 10.18502/jfqhc.6.1.451
متن کامل